Sheriff Clarke – A Lawless Decade Made Enforcing The Law As It’s Written Controversial

sheriff david clarke

 

Sheriff David Clarke joined Maria Bartiromo on the morning after his closing speech to CPAC. He started off with an explanation of his challenge to the CPAC audience when he urged them to “go forth to stand and fight.” He says his words were in recognition of the fact that “we’re at a crossroads in this country right now, we have a new administration and we finally have some push back against this lawlessness and this chaos that’s gone on, probably for the last decade.”

Clarke continues, “And so this country will now define itself, probably for the next generation.” He notes how his speech was a reminder of patriot victories of the past and how people had to fight and die in order to achieve them and for the freedom of future generations. He says, “And so I think we’re at that right now and I wanted to give people again, a reminder of what it took. It took a fight, it took a struggle, it wasn’t easy then and it’s not going to be easy now.”

Bartiromo says she’s mystified how the simple act of following the rule of law could be considered controversial. Clarke says he was hoping she’d be able to help him out because he’s just as lost as she is, that enforcing the rule of law, the bedrock of our Constitution, the bedrock of freedom and liberty, is now controversial.

He says, “I thought to myself, just because prior administrations, for a long time, and it’s transcended political parties, weren’t enforcing our borders, weren’t protecting our borders, weren’t enforcing the immigration statutes on the books. Now all of a sudden President Trump comes along and he’s told us what he was going to do, with existing law, he didn’t make any new law. Now all of a sudden that becomes controversial.”

“Just because it wasn’t enforced,” says Clarke, “our borders and our immigration laws for the last three decades, doesn’t mean that President Donald Trump is obligated to follow that. He’s not, he’s getting back to the rule of law. And the illegal immigration is a crisis in this country. Most of the people in Washington don’t want to touch it, it’s kind of like that third rail. But President Trump decided and has told us he’s going to lead this country, he’s going to get his arms around this thing, even though he knows it’s going to come with that struggle.”

Clarke recognizes it as a crisis that has to be rectified and cites numerous reasons why that is the case. He acknowledges that the courts may ultimately have the final say in the debate over the constitutionality of the president’s efforts to protect the people through the constitutional methods he’s employed. He states, “I don’t like the fact that the courts are intruding on the executive branch and taking over national security, which is the purview of the executive. It is the President of the United States that takes the oath to defend the United States against foreign threats. Not the courts.”

Thank you for reading and sharing my work – Facebook is trying to starve us out of existence, having cut literally 98% of our traffic over the last year. Your shares are crucial for our survival, and we thank you. We’ve also created a presence on Gab.ai and MeWe.com, although their reach is presently much smaller, the continued abuse by Facebook of conservative voices leaves us no option. We’re remaining on Facebook for the time being, as we make the transition. Please take a look when you have a chance or if we “suddenly disappear” from Facebook as has happened to many other truth-tellers. They’ll either starve us out or take us down, one way or another,  sooner or later. Now and in the future, please look for me, Rick Wells, at http://www.facebook.com/RickRWells/ , http://www.gab.ai/RickRWells , https://mewe.com/profile/rick.wells.1  and on my website http://RickWells.US  – Please SUBSCRIBE in the right sidebar at RickWells.US – not dot com.  I’m also at Stop The Takeover, https://www.facebook.com/StopTheTakeover/ and please follow me on Twitter @RickRWells.

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

5 Comments on Sheriff Clarke – A Lawless Decade Made Enforcing The Law As It’s Written Controversial

  1. Truth, on your comment about the four lawless presidents, i couldn’t agree more, but you have to remember they’re all four GLOBALISTS! AS WELL AS JEB BUSH.

  2. We’ve actually had 4 lawless Presidents a) bush sr b) clinton c) bush jr d) obama

  3. BRAVO TO YOU SHERIFF CLARKE !—I am in agreement with you.
    A caveat however is this: The underbelly of Congress’s responsibility should not be only to craft new law; DON’T WE ALREADY HAVE ENOUGH LAWS ! Their purpose must be to ascertain that laws as written are being followed; and when not, then given the full oversight responsibility that such laws are properly being administered and adjudicated by other Gov’t branches, whether it be the DOJ of DHS or IRS or any other Gov’t alphabet agency. Penalties must be put in place with enough conviction of Congress to ensure laws as written are being fulfilled. Any laws, and there are many those of course, that are obsolete and deemed archaic should be abolished.

    • I don’t like the term “archaic” because the Left see’s our Constitution as such. Unlike the a Leftist tho, I am not going to have a hissy over it and just point out my view of the fault in the use of the word. Trust not a liberal/leftist/ media with sane use of wording. 😉

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


%d bloggers like this: