RT Dem Ed Schultz calls for Clinton expulsion from Democrat Party politics as the deliberate lying by her and surrogates in attacking Russia and Trump now is admitted…
The folks at the Russian state network RT are enjoying their vindication from the false “Russian dossier” reporting by the leftist mainstream media, with former MSNBC lefty Ed Shultz now, having been fired from the propaganda mill, morphing into one of their more vocal critics, at least for the time being.
Schultz gives an explanation of the latest situation and developments with the Clinton lie machinery and their being forced to admit the truth. He quotes human rights advocate Thor Halvorssen as describing Fusion GPS as “a smear firm, hired to politically destroy people.”
It’s very important to remember, as Schultz will also later point out, that during the entire time that Rep Adam Schiff and others were being trotted out to argue the Russia, Russia, Russia narrative, Clinton and probably Schiff and other surrogates knew they were lying, that the Russia document was a fabricated work of fiction and that every claim they made was a false one.
The report features a clip from Vladimir Putin in which he denies having any involvement in the dossier, which was dismissed by those pressing the narrative, including the mainstream media as a false denial. Had they been acting as press outlets rather than Clinton globalist propaganda agencies, they probably would have demanded real substance before swallowing the Clinton lure and running with it.
Schultz is asked by the anchor, “Why did you find that quote from Adam Schiff to be so significant?” He replies, “Well, he still views the dossier as credible. There’s nothing credible about it at all because it’s a political hack job. It was politically motivated, it was all set up by the Clinton campaign to destroy the opponent.”
“And for the Clinton campaign to send surrogates,” says Schultz, “out on the cables day after day, referencing this dossier, just goes to show how underhanded Hillary Clinton was throughout all of this. And then she writes about it in her book like this MI-6 agent went out and discovered all of this, but she failed to tell everybody and reveal in her book where the money was coming from.”
Schultz says, “Follow the money. How can John Podesta not know, and the WikiLeaks emails show tremendous communication between Marc Elias, the campaign lawyer, and of course, John Podesta, a lot of communication. How could he not know that Elias went out and hired Fusion to go get this guy?”
He asks, “How could Podesta not know that they spent almost six million dollars in this kind of research project to trump it up? And then they had surrogates go out and blame Russia, when Russia constantly said, ‘We don’t have anything to do with this. We’re not interfering, this is not our dossier, this is not our material.'”
“This is so wrong all around,” Schultz says, “and the political calculation of this for the Democrats is they really need to distance themselves from the Clintons.” He says, “These people are tainted, they’re not honest, they don’t deserve to be in power,” as if he’s surprised by this fact. They’re Democrats just like Schultz, honesty is not part of their composition.
He notes, “Trump is now exonerated on a number of different levels by calling fake news fake news, because CNN, MSNBC and Fox News for a while, all took it hook, line and sinker that this was absolute gospel that the Russians were involved. Well, what do you think now?”
He goes on to recommend that AT&T fire Jeff Zucker from CNN as he was the one in the media who built his network’s programming around this fake story and, unless he’s an idiot, had to know as well that there were some major holes in it and that it was not supported by the facts. He turned the network into a political smear machine – what are they going to do in response?
So maybe Ed and the Democrats were asking themselves what the easiest way to move on from the Clintons might be. Allowing justice to run its course would destroy everyone in their party as they’re all corrupt so that is not an attractive option. They’re also not likely to be able to take the high road when it comes to Clinton and other Democrats accepting Russian bribes. He’s got his work cut out for him.
Thank you for reading and sharing my work – Please look for me, Rick Wells at https://www.facebook.com/RickRWells/, https://gab.ai/RickRWells, https://plus.google.com/u/0/+RickwellsUs and on my website http://RickWells.US – Please SUBSCRIBE in the right sidebar at RickWells.US, (not dot com), and also follow me on Twitter @RickRWells.