Rep John Ratcliffe further exposes Dem Adam Schiff as a lying crook and a cover “man” for the corrupt deep state engaged in the coup attempt against President Trump and the…
Maria Bartiromo interviewed Rep John Ratcliffe (R-TX) on Sunday, getting things started by asking him what the biggest takeaway was from the Democrat memo, the response to the Republican memo released earlier.
Ratcliffe says it’s located on page five, which is the middle of the ten-page document. That’s not unlike the utilization of an obscure footnote to supposedly inform the FISA Judge that Hillary Clinton was the basis for the warrant on American citizen, Carter Page.
Ratcliffe points out that Schiff and his Democrat comrades “admit although Hillary Clinton and the DNC were not disclosed to the FISA Court, they argue that the court was provided with sufficient information from which to understand the political context of Steele’s dossier.”
“The problem with that is,” says Ratcliffe, “they’re saying that the court could have figured it out and that’s not the standard. The FISA Court must be told. They must be told clearly, expressly, unequivocally and fully. And in this case they clearly were not told about Hillary Clinton and the DNC, about Steele and desperate to keeping him from becoming president, or his relationship with Bruce Ohr and his wife at the Department of Justice or the fact that Steele was the source of the Michael Isikoff Yahoo article.” [[VIDEO BELOW]]
She plays a clip of Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes and his comments at CPAC in which he asks if it wouldn’t have been a lot easier to just let the judge know in clear, unhidden language and comments that Hillary Clinton and the DNC purchased the information her fellow conspirators were using to attack her political opponents from the Russians and laundered it through a couple of times in the process.
Of course that admission would have resulted in the warrant being denied and could have produced some prosecutions so it wasn’t going to happen. Ratcliffe points out that Nunes was correct to state that it would have been easier but what he didn’t say was that it was also required.
He also brings up the fact that Adam Schiff went to length in the memo to talk about the criticism by Republicans of FBI agent Peter Strzok and DOJ lawyer Bruce Ohr and “that they are unfairly maligned in this process.” He asks, “You know who doesn’t think Ohr and Strzok did a good job? The FBI and the Department of Justice,” noting that they were both demoted following the revelations of misconduct.
With the Inspector General’s report due out in March, Ratcliffe says he expects that report to refute the contentions of the Democrat cover man Adam Schiff that everything is and was being done right at the DOJ and FBI and that those departures from protocol will be significant.
He says “We’ll see.” Does that mean we’ll see if AG Sessions continues to ignore the fires burning everywhere around him? – We’ll see.
If you’re also fed up with Facebook censorship targeting patriots and America, look for me on GAB at https://gab.ai/RickRWells, and on my website http://RickWells.US – Please SUBSCRIBE in the right sidebar at RickWells.US to receive my posts directly by email, safely beyond the censorship of little comrade Zuckerberg. Thanks for reading my work.