Podesta House Russia Testimony – Details Of Corruption Or Narrow “Safe” Charade?

john podesta

On Tuesday afternoon the House Intelligence Committee interviewed former Obama adviser and Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, supposedly in their pursuit of the truth related to the so-called Russian interference into our 2016 election. Thankfully they didn’t have the crack crime-fighter James Comey conducting the interview. If he had, Podesta would have been given amnesty and all of the evidence destroyed. There would have been no records kept of the interview, which would have been done with Podesta not under oath and a decision made not to prosecute anybody for anything – ever.

For once there were no leaks, indicating strongly that it is a Democrat or multiple Democrats who are the “customary” leakers, those who only leak sensitive things that are damaging to the President. They wouldn’t want to end up like Seth Rich by spilling any Democrat beans. The interview lasted roughly two hours with Podesta characterizing it as questions relative to what he knew about Russian hacking.

That means they could have chosen not to ask him about his own business dealings with Putin owned entities such as Rusnano and its relationship to Joule Energy, which Podesta held 75,000 shares of undeclared stock in, or his role in the sale of American uranium to the Russians through Clinton and the related Clinton Foundation “donations.” They probably didn’t ask any questions related to his brother Tony Podesta who was a lobbyist for the Uranium One fleecing scam with Clinton and Putin, as well as shady former Ukrainian President and Putin associate Viktor Yanukovich and others. Those corrupt dealings with foreign scumbags earned him and his circle multiple millions of dollars, $900,000 from the “European Center” alone. That might be Russian collusion but it’s not the kind that they’re interested in. Just tell the committee more about how you were suckered into a phishing email scheme, Johnny.

Podesta managed to continue propagating the approved Democrat narrative, at least in public, saying after his testimony, “The [pretend] president [Obama] and the entire administration were dealing with an unprecedented incidence of the weaponization of the fruits of Russian cyber activity and making the best judgments they could on behalf of the American people.” That’s a good one, Johnny boy. You crooks only make decisions based upon what’s best for you to the extent you think you can get away with it and not be found out by the American people. The only thing unprecedented is the level of open corruption we’re seeing in the DC Swamp you and your ilk operate in.

Did they ask you why you refused to allow the FBI to look at the supposedly hacked server, Podesta? Did you tell them Obama’s reason for supposedly knowing about a Kremlin plan to damage the Clinton campaign for months before he issued a public statement blaming them for the WikiLeaks dumps?

Is it because all of this is a charade to cover your corruption and to deceive the American people into thinking something is being done to get to the bottom of it?

 

Thank you for reading and sharing my work –  Please look for me, Rick Wells at https://www.facebook.com/RickRWells/, https://gab.ai/RickRWells, https://plus.google.com/u/0/+RickwellsUs and on my website http://RickWells.US  – Please SUBSCRIBE in the right sidebar at RickWells.US – not dot com, and also follow me on Twitter @RickRWells.

  •  
  • 9
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    9
    Shares
  •  
    9
    Shares
  •  
  • 9
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

4 Comments on Podesta House Russia Testimony – Details Of Corruption Or Narrow “Safe” Charade?

  1. these so called hearings are NOTHING BUT A HORSE AND PONY SHOW.
    when 2018 rolls around maybe WE THE PEOPLE CAN SEND THEM ALL PACKING.
    i STILL WANT TERM LIMITS ON ALL THESE CRIMINALS.

  2. Thomas Oakley // June 28, 2017 at 9:52 pm // Reply

    Just more proof, at least to me, that these so called hearings are a waist of time….They talk, ask questions that do not answer anything. Need the doj/fbi (when they get cleaned up and honest again) to do these investigations, that should be being done on all kinds of subjects, but sad to say are not……Sessons needs to stop his crap and come back to doing his job, the fbi needs a new director, many people need to be fired/charged and rid of. Dam getting tired of these investigations (?) that lead no where, or better yet, that after all that money is spent nothing is done.

  3. Hadenoughalready // June 28, 2017 at 3:38 pm // Reply

    I can’t wait for the mid-terms. Maybe we’ll see a pile of these demon-craps, and RINO’s, get thrown out on their asses, once and for all…

  4. TONYA PARNELL // June 28, 2017 at 3:31 pm // Reply

    Article right on

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*