PIRRO ON FEINSTEIN’S HANDLING OF KAVANAUGH SEXUAL MISCONDUCT ALLEGATION: ‘WHAT WERE YOU THINKING?

Feinstein  a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, for producing revelations of sexual misconduct allegations aimed at U.S. Supreme Court associate justice …

  • 137
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    137
    Shares
  •  
    137
    Shares
  • 137
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
Judge Jeanine Feinstein

(Breitbart) Judge Jeanine Pirro hammered Sen. Dianne Feinstein  a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, for producing revelations of sexual misconduct allegations aimed at U.S. Supreme Court associate justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh after her committee questioned Kavanaugh.

Pirro questioned the timing of the release of the allegations and noted that Feinstein passed on opportunities to question Kavanaugh on the subject.

“Dianne, you’ve been sitting on this letter for almost two months,” she said. “You let Brett Kavanaugh go through days of Senate hearings, meetings with senators, answer an additional 263 pages of 1,300 follow-up written questions — and now you want to character assassinate this man who has undergone six FBI full-field investigations where no such allegation resembling this anonymous nonsense has ever surfaced?

Dianne, as a ranking member of the committee interviewing Kavanaugh, how could you possibly let a moment pass without addressing the issue, and Kavanaugh is right in front of you and would have had the opportunity to respond? What were you thinking? Are you stupid? Why would you let it go?”

“Let me tell you why you let it go, Dianne: Because even you didn’t believe it,” she added. “What other reason could there be?”

Please SUBSCRIBE in the right sidebar at RickWells.US to receive my posts directly by email, safely beyond the censorship of little comrade Zuckerberg. Thank you

  • 137
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    137
    Shares
  •  
    137
    Shares
  • 137
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

4 Comments on PIRRO ON FEINSTEIN’S HANDLING OF KAVANAUGH SEXUAL MISCONDUCT ALLEGATION: ‘WHAT WERE YOU THINKING?

  1. Provide Controversy: There 1 thing special about controversies
    create them comfortably known. The problem is Google is becoming better and better at sifting the wheat from the chaff. https://918kiss.host/66-live22

  2. “Thinking”??… I might suggest Judge, you may be using that word a little too loosely. Evidence suggests any thinking that does go on does not go far beyond “delete the President”, and not much else, certainly not much deeper, but perhaps extending to, “so we can replace him with a more corrupt or more corruptible one from our selection”… When one considers the big mouth front line of that tribe, one could be forgiven for thinking the average IQ is not much higher than their average shoe size.

  3. Pirro is right, and this is another made up me-too BS. I think the whole show was done to try to hold off his confirmation until after the elections. I also believe that Trump better have a plan because a red wave will not keep him from impeachment.

  4. If you would like to see Pirro have Session’s job, raise your hand.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


%d bloggers like this: