JAWS PEREZ DEFENDS NEW RUSSIA DISTRACTION TO PROTECT OBAMA-CLINTON MOBSTERS

DNC Chair Perez explained the latest tactic in defense of the Obama-Clinton-Soros Mafia, a harassment civil lawsuit alleging the same things Congress and Mueller…

  • 319
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    319
    Shares
  •  
    319
    Shares
  • 319
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
thomas perez dnc

DNC Chairman Thomas “Jaws” Perez might be the one who needs a bigger boat before all of the fallout from his frivolous lawsuit against the Trump campaign, WikiLeaks and the shark-eating Russians hiding under his bed. He made the rounds of the friendly propagandists on Sunday, explaining how they’re supposedly filing the suit, not for the obvious propaganda and fundraising benefits that they’re already using it for, but in the interest of protecting the country. Who knew the globalist Democrats were such patriots?

Perez made virtually the same pitch regardless of which Sunday program he was on, reading from the talking points in front of him. On Meet the Press he joined fellow leftist Chuck Todd, who began by asking him why he didn’t just wait for the Mueller witch hunt to run its course.   [[WATCH VIDEO BELOW]]

Indicating that he thinks the Mueller thing could drag out for a very long time if Democrats are successful, Perez says there are statute of limitations considerations. He said, “I don’t know when Director Mueller’s investigation is going to end nor would I ever ask him.” Perez refers to the special counsel as the Director. Given the bias of the FBI and the invisibility of Director Wray, he’s probably correct. Mueller was put back in charge with Rosenstein at DOJ. Wray and Sessions are just feckless figureheads.

Todd asks Perez how close they were to the deadline and he chooses to repeat his previous statement, and indication that he’s not going to answer and a signal for Todd to move on to the next question. Perez continues with the next point that he made everywhere he found a camera, proud of the claim that he’s “done his homework” and that he can walk and chew gum. Given that miniature version of the Sawtooth Mountain Range he carries in his lower jaw, gum doesn’t stand a chance with him.

He says, “Over the course of the last year we have seen, I think, a mountain of evidence of collusion between the campaign and the Russians.” He’s right, but it’s the Clinton campaign, not the Trump team.  He goes on to point number three, his worry over the midterm elections. He goes on to say “they did this with impunity.” If he isn’t talking about the Obama Democrats destroying our DOJ, FBI, State Department and Intelligence agencies, he certainly should be.

He reads a quote attributed to HR McMasters, saying, “We failed to impose sufficient costs on Russia.” He goes on to say, “Well we know why, I think they failed to impose sufficient costs on Russia for this dramatic and reckless and unprecedented hack, because this administration is compromised.”

Of course there is zero evidence to support that allegations, despite the relentless duplicate investigations and he’s exposing the actual reason for the lawsuit, as a replacement for the stalled Mueller effort and a means to enable them to continue to make their unfounded claims directly.

If Todd were a real news man, which he isn’t, he’d have stopped Perez in his tracks and told him that there is no proof a hack ever took place, and that there is more evidence that it was an inside job by Seth Rich, who was later murdered because of it. Todd should have asked him right then and there why the FBI has been prevented from analyzing the server. Instead he lets the baseless claims continue as if they were true.

Todd asks the slippery word-parser Perez, “Did Hillary Clinton push you to do this? Was this something she supported?” Again Perez doesn’t answer the question but makes it sound as if he almost does, replying nervously,” You’ll have to ask Secretary…I have not consulted Hillary Clinton to ask her permission to file a complaint. That wasn’t the question.

He goes into the faux-patriot claim that “our ‘democracy’ is at risk, this was an assault on our democracy.’ It’s an assault on our Republic and it is and was being perpetrated by the corrupt globalist Democrats led by the Obama-Clinton-Soros Mafia. We’re still at risk; especially if the commies win back the House in November.

The truth is it’s a simple progression for the progressive enemies of America. They’ve used fake investigations in Congress, moved on to a sham special counsel investigation, and now will team up with their judiciary activist comrades to continue the attacks on President Trump past the midterms. Nothing is as they say it is, because they’re corrupt, subversive criminals, playing their roles in a grand scheme to steal our nation from the people.

If you’re also fed up with Facebook censorship targeting patriots and America, look for me on GAB at https://gab.ai/RickRWells, on MeWe, and on my website http://RickWells.US  – Please SUBSCRIBE in the right sidebar at RickWells.US to receive my posts directly by email, safely beyond the censorship of little comrade Zuckerberg. Thanks for reading my work.

  • 319
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    319
    Shares
  •  
    319
    Shares
  • 319
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

2 Comments on JAWS PEREZ DEFENDS NEW RUSSIA DISTRACTION TO PROTECT OBAMA-CLINTON MOBSTERS

  1. This is a classic case that requires a pre-hearing during which the plaintiffs should be required to produce sufficient evidence of their allegations of collusion/conspiracy between the Trump campaign, WikiLeaks and Russia to move the case forward. And, if they can’t do so, the case should be summarily dismissed WITH PREJUDICE, and with HUGE sanctions assessed against the plaintiff’s attorneys.

  2. It will be interesting to see how the mid term elections shake out. If the Ds win we know that the system has indoctrinated too many voters. If the Rs win without being taken out in the primary, the lesser of two evils still wins.

    If the GOP allows this witch hunt to continue past Nov. we may see the real agenda be carried out. I don’t know why, but the uni-party may go through impeachment.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*