RAND PAUL EXPLAINS WHY HE SWITCHED HIS VOTE TO “YES” ON POMPEO

Senator Rand Paul had been expected to be a “no” vote in the Foreign Relations Committee on CIA Director Pompeo for Secretary of State. He had a change of heart…

  •  
  •  
  • 157
  •  
  •  
  •  
    157
    Shares
  •  
    157
    Shares
  • 157
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
rand paul

President Trump’s nominee to replace globalist Rex Tillerson as Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, received an unexpected recommendation by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) voted to recommend and Senator Chris Coons (D-DE) changed his vote to “present” from “no.”   [[WATCH VIDEO BELOW]]

The 11-10 committee vote was largely a symbolic gesture, as three Democrats up for reelection in states President Trump carried have already stated that they would be voting for confirmation, Joe Manchin (WV), Heidi Heitkamp (ND) and Joe Donnelly (IN).

Rand Paul joined Martha McCallum to explain what prompted him to switch his vote from a “no” to a “yes.” He stated that after meeting with and again speaking with Director Pompeo as well as several conversations with President Trump on the matter, he felt more comfortable that Pompeo shares President Trump’s negative views on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and wars of regime change.

Paul said, “The President reiterated in very strong terms that we’ve been at war in too many places for too long. And I think the President’s going to surprise a lot of people by really, really trying hard to get us extricated from some of these wars.”

Asked if President Trump promised that type of quick exit from Syria, Paul replied, “I think it wasn’t so much specific on timetable and places, but I would tell you that the President and I share a great deal when we talk about the desire to bring some of our troops home and to have our troops protecting our country and not spread out across the world.”

He continues, “And really, I’ve always been an advocate, I mean, Trump was probably the closest to me on foreign policy of any of the other sixteen running, and so I’ve always been an advocate and a supporter of the President on this. And I want to make sure the people around him share his vision. And over time I’m coming to believe that, and I’m hopeful that Director Pompeo does share that vision.”

Paul adds, “But the President told me one way or another it’s his vision and he’s not going to be persuaded to start more land wars and have hundreds of thousands of troops in the Middle East, no matter who’s around him.”

If you’re also fed up with Facebook censorship targeting patriots and America, look for me on GAB at https://gab.ai/RickRWells, on MeWe, and on my website http://RickWells.US  – Please SUBSCRIBE in the right sidebar at RickWells.US to receive my posts directly by email, safely beyond the censorship of little comrade Zuckerberg. Thanks for reading my work.

  •  
  •  
  • 157
  •  
  •  
  •  
    157
    Shares
  •  
    157
    Shares
  • 157
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

5 Comments on RAND PAUL EXPLAINS WHY HE SWITCHED HIS VOTE TO “YES” ON POMPEO

  1. well.
    we will just have to wait and see.
    but i have said for YEARS NOW this so called war on Terrorism needs to end.
    let the SOB’S KILL EACH OTHER.

  2. Kitty Corbett // April 24, 2018 at 8:55 am // Reply

    I deeply respect Senator Rand Paul and was very glad to see him now being supportive of President’s Trump pick for Secretary of State, Pompeo. There was a moment when I was afraid he was going to do a dastardly McCain act, for what reason I couldn’t imagine, as we need to support our President and his mission to Make America Great Again.

  3. “…….. I think the President’s going to surprise a lot of people by really, really trying hard to get us extricated from some of these wars.”

    I’m really, really trying hard to think of a reason I should believe that. I think they told Rand Paul what he wanted to hear and he had no choice. If this were true then it would be a reason why they want Trump out.

    Trump has done a complete reversal from the campaign rhetoric.

    • I don’t see that DJT has done a complete reversal from what he said in his campaign. As to believing his word, if Paul talked to him extensively, and believes him, why would we not? We haven’t talked to him.

      • The entire rhetoric of the campaign was that the US is spending untold $$ and lives on wars that do not benefit us. That we need to get out of Nation building and regime change. Afghanistan was a useless war giving us no benefit.

        Then, as reported?, Ivanka says bomb Syria and we bomb Syria based on nothing, Then a false flag chem attack and we bomb Syria again. We threaten countries on Twitter?

        I could list dozens but, “we are building the wall” was a scam, they were only fixing fencing. “We are sending the military to secure the border”, was a scam, they were not allowed to engage the illegals.

        For me, once someone lies and cons me I don’t trust them anymore, and at the very least don’t know when to believe them.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


%d bloggers like this: