No Christianity Allowed In “Religion Of Peace” Promoting School District

san diego school district


The speaker at the school board meeting is Stan Anjan, the executive director of Family and Community Engagement for the San Diego Unified School District. He leaves little to the imagination for those attempting to determine his motives and the threat he poses to regular, everyday Americans.

He says, “I truly believe that if we do this right, San Diego Unified School District will be the leading school district in the nation to come up with a robust and beautiful anti-bullying and anti-Islamophobia program.”

For those who might have been lost in his sanitized diversionary description of what he’s up to, they’re going to mandate students be exposed to Islamic training, with an eye towards acceptance of Islamic beliefs. They also intend to elevate Islam in issues regarding the conflicts with American cultural values and the Constitutional and their Sharia Law.

As the video explains quite well, that includes a prohibition on any criticism of Islam, which is a component of the teachings of Sharia Law. Just as Hussein Obama or DHS Secretary Jihadi Jeh Johnson always refused to associate the words Islam and radical terrorism, that’s the type of restrictions on the First Amendment and the adaptation of a preferred state-endorsed religion that are being introduced to San Diego with the start of the next school year. It will take time, but they’re making the start, which is significant and should be viewed as a red flag.

The video points to an article from the LA Times, although some of the language appears identical to that of the San Diego Union Tribune. It states, “The San Diego Unified School District administrators and teachers will have calendars showing Islamic holidays, students will learn more about the religion in social studies classes  and safe places will be created on campuses for Muslim students as part of a multi-tiered approach to combating Islamophobia.”

One things that needs to be cleared up about this misguided and incorrect terminology of “Islamophobia,” is that a phobia is indicative of a fear. That’s a stretch in many cases. Unless someone is standing there in their man-dress with their finger on a detonator, screaming Allahu Akbar or with an AR-15 pointed in my direction, it’s hardly a case of fearing Islam or their proponents.

Fear and loathing or disdain are completely different things. If the school board and others want to be correct, referring to it as Islamo-indifference might be the least offensive compromise, but that does still kind of sugar coat things. Eventually the Islamists force indifference to become loathing through their demanding, conquering and intolerant behavior.

They revealed their indoctrination and submission plans for the new, state-sponsored replacement for Christianity and our Constitution further, stating, “Schools also will review and vet materials related to Muslim culture and history in media centers and provide resources and material for teachers.

Anjan said “Social studies lessons may include more information on prominent Muslims and their impact on history and other steps to promote a more positive image of Islam.” When did promoting any  “religion” become the responsibility of the public schools? Maybe clock boy could be a guest speaker.

The agitator is also working to direct the curriculum away from traditional American values, saying, “Sometimes curriculum has had a much more Eurocentric approach. We’re now thinking of how to diversify social studies curriculum.” Diversify is code for diminish and remove white America in the pursuit of Islamification.

There’s also a new hybrid indoctrination – reeducation form of dealing with those rebellious students who aren’t submissive enough in the beginning. According to Anjan, “The plan also calls for a different approach in disciplining students who bully Muslim students. Rather than detention, the school will use a restorative justice method involving the student who did the bullying speaking with the other student to restore their relationship.”

Forced acceptance by any other name is still the same thing and a failure to comply or a repeat “offense” will surely carry escalating consequences, such as suspension or expulsion. Only so much infidel intolerance will be tolerated.


Thank you for reading and sharing my work –  Please look for me, Rick Wells, at , , and on my website http://RickWells.US  – Please SUBSCRIBE in the right sidebar at RickWells.US – not dot com.  I’m also at Stop The Takeover, and please follow me on Twitter @RickRWells. Subsribe also on my YouTube Channel.

%d bloggers like this: