MARK LEVIN: AS A MATTER OF LAW TRUMP NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT IS NOTHING

Levin comments came after President Trump’s former attorney, Michael Cohen, pleaded guilty to eight federal charges, he reportedly said that he participated…

  •  
  •  
  • 79
  •  
  •  
  •  
    79
    Shares
  •  
    79
    Shares
  • 79
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
Mark Levin

Mark Levin’s comments came after President Donald Trump’s former attorney, Michael Cohen, pleaded guilty to eight federal charges, Cohen reportedly said, that he participated in the conduct of payments made to actress Stormy Daniels and ex-Playboy model Karen McDougal for the purposes of influencing the election.

Levin said, as a matter of law, prosecutors are supposed to be focused on, this is nothing. Campaign funds weren’t used. The test isn’t whether a candidate is free to clean up his mess with his own money, or perceived mess.

He continued saying, Stormy Daniels entered into this agreement. She was paid money. Now she violated the agreement, and is effectively blackmailing the president of the United States. Let her slip-and-fall lawyer go into federal court with that one. What exactly is she suing for?

And so the media take the Cohen plea deal, the Lanny Davis plea deal, the prosecutor’s plea deal, claim what the prosecutor said, what Lanny Davis is saying and what Cohen plead to is the law.

And now, ladies and gentlemen, now there’s more reason to impeach the president of the United States. You’ve got other knuckleheads out there saying the president is in legal jeopardy. No, he’s not. No, he’s not.

Paid with private funds, nondisclosure agreement, two cases. Mr. Dershowitz says if he directed his lawyer to do so, and didn’t reimburse his lawyer, then you got an issue. No you don’t. First of all, it didn’t happen. But no you don’t, as long as the lawyer didn’t use campaign funds, which he didn’t.

Levin continued,  let’s take the worst case scenario: If Donald Trump directed Michael Cohen to make payments to both of these women, if he directed Michael Cohen to use his law firms or his trust fund, or whatever they want to call it, to pay them and then he would be reimbursed, either through a Trump corporation or Donald Trump personally, even if all that happened, so what? So what?

As I’ve said on this program yesterday and on Hannity last night,it has been regurgitated by some of the smarter radio hosts who know to listen to what I’m saying, that’s not an adjudication. There’s been no adjudication. There’s been a plea bargain.

Please SUBSCRIBE in the right sidebar at RickWells.US to receive my posts directly by email, safely beyond the censorship of little comrade Zuckerberg. Thank you.

  •  
  •  
  • 79
  •  
  •  
  •  
    79
    Shares
  •  
    79
    Shares
  • 79
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

2 Comments on MARK LEVIN: AS A MATTER OF LAW TRUMP NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT IS NOTHING

  1. Where there is no crime they simply say it’s a crime and seem to get away with it. The uni-party, both sides, are in on it and if nothing else they will, over time, wear every one down to the point where their cries for impeachment will materialize.

  2. what those CRIMINALS AND TRAITORS AT THE DOJ AND THIS MUELLER CRIMINAL IS DOING TO TRY ND CREATE A CRIME WHERE THERE IS NONE, AND A VIOLATION OF THAT NONE LAW TO TRY AND IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT.
    wonder WHY THE MUSLIM FRAUD AND OLD HILLARY BEAST WHO WE KNOW VIOLATED EVERY LAW IS STILL FREE?
    THOSE COMMUNIST ARE GOING TO KEEP PUSHING UNTIL WE THE PEOPLE PUSH BACK.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


%d bloggers like this: