Lawyer Denied CLINTON FOIA For No Interest Says DOJ Now Having 2nd Thoughts

carlson clinton foia

Ty Clevenger, an Attorney whose FOIA request for documents on Hillary Clinton was recently turned down by David Hardy, a dirty cop inside the bureau, joins Tucker Carlson to explain just what happened.

Hardy ruled Clinton’s privacy rights outweighed any public interest in their release. Clevenger says the FBI is acting like Obama is still in charge, not the first person to make that observation.

Clevenger explains that he’s writing a book about corruption in the legal profession and the courts, noting that “most state bars will cover up for politically prominent lawyers. So I thought, ‘Well, this would be the perfect case study, to file a grievance against Mrs. Clinton and her attorneys for destroying email evidence.”

He continues, “And so as part of that I filed FOIAs to get evidence in support of the grievances, and then I got this letter from the FBI telling me it was not a matter of public interest.” Carlson attempts to clarify the way in which “interest” is being used, saying, “meaning it’s not in the public’s interest, not meaning the public doesn’t care but it’s not good for the country.”

Clevenger replies, “Actually, no, they’re saying the public doesn’t care. That’s one of the, in this particular circumstance there are three reasons not to release it. They can say that the subject, which would be Mrs. Clinton, is either dead, which she’s not, or she’s consented to release, which she hasn’t, or that this isn’t a matter of public interest.”

“And the FBI, despite the fact that I sent them newspaper articles,” says Clevenger, “said it was not a matter of public interest. Having said that, though, I think they are changing course. I got an email this afternoon from the Justice Department. I appealed the denial to DOJ and now DOJ has already granted my request to expedite its response.”

Clevenger notes, “The reason that’s significant is because my grounds for requesting the expedited response was this was a matter of public interest. So DOJ has already conceded this is a matter of public interest. Carlson laughs at the absurdity, saying, “Well, yeah, you’re talking about it on television right now.”

He says, “It just seems very odd that they could ever make that claim.” He asks Clevenger for his opinion as to the motive behind all of this. He replies that he’s actually changed his view. At first he thought it was just an Obama holdover doing what they do and trying to cover this up.

He raises the “letter sent by Senators Graham and Grassley which indicated that the former FBI director, James Comey, had already decided to exonerate Mrs. Clinton before she had ever even been interviewed. And so at this point I think that the FBI is trying to cover its own rear end. I think they know this thing’s going to look terrible for them.”

He adds, “They deep-sixed this, they whitewashed it and they don’t want the documents coming out just showing how badly they covered it up.”

He notes that, “If an average lawyer destroyed thirty thousand pieces of evidence he would be disbarred and prosecuted, criminally. Anybody else would have been prosecuted criminally and as an attorney disbarred under these exact same circumstances.”

 

Thank you for reading and sharing my work –  Please look for me, Rick Wells at https://www.facebook.com/RickRWells/, https://gab.ai/RickRWells, https://plus.google.com/u/0/+RickwellsUs and on my website http://RickWells.US  – Please SUBSCRIBE in the right sidebar at RickWells.US – not dot com, and also follow me on Twitter @RickRWells.

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

10 Comments on Lawyer Denied CLINTON FOIA For No Interest Says DOJ Now Having 2nd Thoughts

  1. As the story stated: “Clevenger explains that he’s writing a book about corruption in the legal profession and the courts, noting that “most state bars will cover up for politically prominent lawyers. So I thought, ‘Well, this would be the perfect case study, to file a grievance against Mrs. Clinton and her attorneys for destroying email evidence.”

    Clevenger is writing a book. To me, that says a lot. I don’t trust him.

  2. like you said Ben.
    NOT so much for me, but our Grand Kids ext.
    like Trey Gowdy has said he just wants those DOCS.
    and so far SESSIONS is not releasing them, but that one Judge said they MUST BE RELEASED, but i bet if they are they will be SO REDACTED NO ONE WILL BE ABLE TO READ THEM.
    Congress has OVERSIGHT over all those AGENCIES, THEY ARE NOT A DAMN LAW UNTO THEMSELVES EVEN THO THEY THINK SO.
    so far as i see things, THE DAMN SWAMP IS WINNING.

  3. Ben.
    we elected Trump NOT THE REST OF HIS FAMILY.

    • James, yes we did. Unfortunately there appears to be quite a difference between campaign Trump and President Trump. Unless this is some masterful rope-a-dope, he is steering policies according to the princess’s socialist leanings.

      She and her globalist pals are In effect running things as of now, they seem to be calling the shots. “If voting mattered they would not let us vote”.

      I had high hopes when Trump got in and Sessions was placed. Not so much for me but for my grand kids.

  4. The swamp creature that denied this should be removed …. IMMEDIATELY!

  5. I’m guessing that the “Princess Ivanka” is heading the cover for the Hillary brigade in/from the WH..

  6. Patricia Anno // September 8, 2017 at 9:25 pm // Reply

    Anything Clinton was involved in, any paper work, any emails, meetings having to do with Americas business belongs to We The People. She has no privacy when we paid her to do a specific job. American tax payers have paid her and others to jerk us around, lie, cover up and pull shady deals. While she and others bank accounts grew. Crime Inc which includes all of the Obama administration are guilty of actions above and beyond lawful.

    • Exactly so. We know it, and they know we know it. Wish she would come to my door when I have my good old crowbar handy, lol.

  7. as Ali said.
    THEY CAN RUN, BUT THEY CAN’T HIDE.
    THIS HAS TO ALL COME TO THE TOP IN TIME.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*