Grassley – Texts Prove FBI Let Clinton Off – Demands Answers From Dir Wray

FBI Dir Wray has some explaining to do. Sen Grassley sent him a letter in response to text messages that prove Clinton was let off by the FBI, and complicit in sedition against Trump

  • 539
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    539
    Shares
  •  
    539
    Shares
  • 539
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
charles grassley

Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) revealed on Thursday another of the text exchanges between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, from the 384 pages that were recently provided to his Judiciary Committee by the DOJ.

In a January 25th letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray, Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which has oversight over the FBI and DOJ, contends that the exchange is proof the FBI was “Pulling Punches in the Clinton Investigation.” Strzok was running that investigation as deputy chief of the FBI’s counterintelligence division.

The text exchanges referenced by Grassley in his letter show not only a pro-Clinton bias but an agreement to back off from the investigation due to Clinton being a candidate for president. Page wrote to Strzok, “One more thing: she might be our next president. The last thing you need us going in there loaded for bear. You think she’s going to remember or care that it was more doj than fbi?”

Their own words reveal that since Clinton might have been our next president, her extreme criminal conduct was ignored by the corrupt agents responsible for the investigation.” Of course no similar considerations were illegally extended to President Trump. Instead they engaged in the fabrication of evidence against him and an effort to remove him from office.

There are also indications that the plot extended beyond Strzok, Page and McCabe, with a statement by Strzok of, “I called Bill and relayed what we discussed. He agrees. I will email you and [redacted] same.” The “Bill” referenced is believed to be Bill Priestap, the FBI chief of counterintelligence who is considered a likely suspect as the “mastermind” of the entire anti-Trump, pro Clinton coup. The redacted name is also clearly a co-conspirator, hopefully one that Grassley redacted for public release and is fully aware of.

Strzok later met Clinton face to face, in what was probably seen as a major career opportunity for him at the time, as he conducted her staged interview as  part of the sham email investigation. He also interviewed Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills and Jake Sullivan and likewise let all of them off the hook. None were found by Strzok to have committed any crimes when the removed classified documents to an unsecured location or by the destruction of other government documents and electronic devices. Perhaps Director Wray can explain how that works.

Strzok then went on to set a perjury trap for General Michael Flynn just a few weeks later and to become part of Mueller’s witch hunt team before being reassigned to the FBI’s HR department as a means of attempting to hide him from investigative eyes.

Democrats have denied there is any substance to the text messages, and have made the vague, generalized accusations that they are taken out of context and being distorted by Republicans as a means to divert attention from the fraud that is the Mueller Trump-Russia probe.

How about a few specifics, Democrats, explain how Republicans are distorting this exchange. Maybe Comey and Mueller’s longtime crony, FBI Director Christopher Wray, can explain why he was willing to threaten to resign his position to save Andrew McCabe, who was coordinating and leading this corrupt assault on the President of the United States and the exoneration of one of the most damaging espionage criminals in the history of our nation, Hillary Clinton.

She can’t be feeling too good about 2018 thus far. These latest developments are screaming out for a real investigation to be done by unbiased, non-partisan agents. That’s bad news for the criminal leadership cabal inside DOJ and the FBI, and it’s worse news for Clinton, Abedin, Mills and the rest of the espionage criminals who thought until recently that they got away with it. They may face justice after all. 

 

If you’re also fed up with Facebook censorship targeting patriots and America, look for me on GAB at https://gab.ai/RickRWells, and on my website http://RickWells.US  – Please SUBSCRIBE in the right sidebar at RickWells.US to receive my posts directly by email, safely beyond the censorship of little comrade Zuckerberg. Thanks for reading my work.

  • 539
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    539
    Shares
  •  
    539
    Shares
  • 539
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

7 Comments on Grassley – Texts Prove FBI Let Clinton Off – Demands Answers From Dir Wray

  1. Nancy ES Malacaria // January 28, 2018 at 10:21 am // Reply

    Thank you for providing all of this vital information to us, Mr. Wells. Your manner is professional, your knowledge comprehensive, and your flowing words well said in plain language. The education that you spread is a wealth of protection to all of our free, informed choices and votes. The fruit of your sacrifice lands on its mark every single time, I assure you. The greatest work done right now is not even seen or heard yet, but laid in stone today to be set for the morrow.

  2. Great I’ve been demanding demanding answers for at least a decade, and on the current corruption for over a year. Except for the D side of the uni-party there may be few of yet to demand answers.

  3. We, the people, always get the short end of the stick, don’t we? What would happen to one of us if we broke any itsy-bitsy law? We’d go to jail, of course. Yet we see these establishment criminals breaking the law daily, there are no indictments, no arrests, nothing; they, in fact, still have their cushy jobs paid for by us.

  4. The FBI had no legal business declaring Hillary innocent or guilty. It was up to the DOJ to decide whether or not to prosecute. Comey had no right to make any kind of judgment for or against Hillary.

    Apart from that, why the heck do you shove huge pop-ups in our faces as soon as we try to read the article? Put it at the end where we can see it, and don’t make it a pop-up. It’s rude!

    • I’m not sure what pop up you’re talking about, Dale, although anything at the bottom of an article is much less likely to be seen as folks tend to drop out as they read through an article. If you knew how hard I’m fighting the piece of shit Mark Zuckerberg and others just to stay in business as a conservative voice and how little financial rewards there are to this you might forgive me for my “rudeness” of trying to put food on the table – I could go work somewhere else or not at all. That would eliminate your popup problem. There’s no free lunch – how do you think I’d have the time to write all day and work a regular job as well? Please tell me how to do it and I’ll be glad to eliminate the “rude” ads altogether.

  5. James Higginbotham // January 26, 2018 at 10:23 am // Reply

    the head of the FBI now is just another DIRTY COP i feel.
    Trump had better STAY AWAY from Mueller and this so called interview coming up.
    we REALLY NEED A REAL AG, and Trump NEEDS BETTER ADVISORS AND LAWYERS.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*