Court Rules Against In-State Tuition For Illegal Alien Foreigners

illegals in-state tuition

Democrats are masters of mislabeling, putting a pretty sounding, deceptive name on an ugly, horrendous, financially disastrous piece of legislation. That’s how we got the Affordable Care Act and it’s the kind of thing that also results in identifying illegal alien squatter offspring as “DREAMers,” the beneficiaries of the similarly inappropriately titled DREAM Act.

The assumption and association made with the title is that it is a law that allows the illegals to “dream” or to live their dreams, which it does, in violation of federal law. There actually is no act but a proposed, multiple times failed, piece of legislation that does not carry the weight of law. It carries only the weight of the rampant lawlessness of the Obama regime and others, such as Dick Durbin and Republican Orrin Hatch, who first introduced it in 2001.

It’s not a law, it’s a documented violation of the law, initiated by Hussein Obama and one that President Trump could easily undo with a memo or executive order. It’s titled upon the concept of illegality packaged through the deliberate diminishing of the offensive nature of their actions. Obama simply declared the fundamental aspects of the failed legislation to be in effect, allowing illegal aliens to squat in America under the contorted acronym of “Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors.” Calling it the Amnesty for Border Crashers, “ABC Act,” wasn’t catchy or deceptive enough and the “There’s The Bus Get On It Act” has still not yet been proposed.

But progress is being made. An appellate court in Arizona has ruled that DACA recipients, the so-called DREAMers, cannot receive in-state tuition rates. Immigration Reform Law Institute’s (IRLI) executive director and general counsel, Dale Wilcox, told Breitbart Texas, “The decision is key because in-state tuition is yet another benefit that acts as a magnet for illegal aliens choosing to make the reckless and irresponsible decision to bring their children illegally across our sovereign borders.”

Activists for the illegals had argued that federal Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) passed by Congress in 1996 generally allows the states to determine what public benefits are available for illegals, ignoring the most basic component that they are in the country in violation of the law. The Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), also passed in 1996, “does not allow any state to provide non-qualified aliens with postsecondary education benefits based upon their residence within the state.”

One of the defendants in the lawsuit, the Maricopa County Community College District Board, began accepting employment authorization documents (EADs) issued by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) as evidence that they qualified for residence-based, in-state tuition. DACA and the issuance of an EAD is evidence that they are in the US illegally, far from an authorization document.

Wilcox noted, “Disturbingly, there have been several courts that have attempted to codify DACA-recipients as somehow being a lawful and benefits-eligibility class of persons, much like citizens and legal residents. But this is absolutely not the case when one looks honestly at our democratically-enacted laws.” He added, “DACA-recipients are illegal aliens, and they are still absolutely removable under the law.”

A spokesman for the college district was reported to release a statement saying, “The Maricopa County Community College District is built on a foundation of providing access to higher education for diverse students and communities, and we continue to be committed to that mission.” Diversity and earth worship are the religions of the left. It makes no difference to them if the student is an American in any regard. They don’t really see us as a nation but as a region of the global government, and all of us as global citizens. Lock a few of them up, examine their rolls for illegals, prosecute them for the violations to our federal immigration laws that they are committing and see if their tune changes any.


Please feel free to COMMENT BELOW:


Thank you for reading and sharing my work –  Please look for me, Rick Wells at,, and on my website http://RickWells.US  – Please SUBSCRIBE in the right sidebar at RickWells.US – not dot com, and also follow me on Twitter @RickRWells.


7 Comments on Court Rules Against In-State Tuition For Illegal Alien Foreigners

  1. Absolutely ‘remove them, under the law,” and send them a tuition bill like the one we American citizens are still paying.

  2. Shel Scott // June 25, 2017 at 12:51 pm // Reply

    An illegal alien is not an “immigrant”.
    One would hope anyone who is a “teacher” would understand that.
    Oh, wait. Never mind.

  3. Debra Prisk // June 25, 2017 at 11:59 am // Reply

    Finally a court who ruled the correct way.

  4. An illegal alien is a criminal and nothing a criminal acquires by a crime is theirs. And children born in the US to illegal aliens, visitors, migrant workers, diplomats, and even refugees, are not and never have been US citizens. Amendment 14 give conditional soil based citizenship and that is dependent upon at least one of the parent having fealty to the US. And only US citizens and real immigrants have that. We need to start cleaning house and deporting ALL illegal aliens. And those that keep invading need to be treated as invaders.

  5. If DACA is, in fact, for illegals, the Dems made ICE endeavors to round illegals up a dream come true! Go get them!

  6. OUTSTANDING !!! Stuff like this makes me happier and happier every day.

  7. “There’s The Bus Get On It Act” I love that one and will vote for it if I get the chance!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


%d bloggers like this: