Atty Describes Just How Lawless Obama Hawaii Homey’s Political Ruling Is

judge watson hawaii obama


The lawlessness of Hussein Obama naturally didn’t stop when he left his squatting position inside our White House. To the contrary, lacking the power to abuse the Constitution and America directly, he’s being forced into other acts of lawlessness to press his agenda. As we know, these offenses cover every facet of American society, but stopping President Trump is a common thread to most of them. In that regard a multitude of irregularities are evident in the actions of his lackey “so-called” Hawaii judge halting the executive order banning terrorists from entering the United States.

Obama and his boy believe that they should be able to exercise their international civil rights to blow people up wherever they choose. That’s how the Obama appointee and personal friend masquerading as a  judge ruled. It sounds ridiculous, but it is true, as attorney Robert Barnes explains.

He notes that not only did the insane overreach prevent the President of the United States from enforcing his own executive order, the judge then tied the hands of every other state in ordering that his ruling applies to the entire nation. Barnes described it as Obama’s buddy, the judge “making himself a one-man Supreme Court and substitute President.”

But he was just getting started, Obama’s comrade also declared, according to Barnes, that “American universities and immigrants living here can prohibit America from ever limiting immigration from Muslim-heavy countries, claiming the First Amendment gives Muslim-dominant nations a right of immigration to America.”

He states that the judge’s ruling is completely lawless, that it mirrors “Obama’s deep state allies in his shadow government’s attempt to sabotage the Trump presidency. There is no precedent for the court’s order. In fact, every precedent is against the court’s order; just read the detailed logic and scholastic citation of proper governing legal authorities from the decision of a moderately liberal Boston judge who upheld every part of Trump’s prior order.”

In a Breitbart article, Barnes touched on a few reasons why this ruling is baseless, lawless and without precedent. He noted that:

  • First, nationwide injunctions for non-party plaintiffs are not supposed to happen. A district judge presides over his district, not the nation.
  • The Ninth Circuit itself even admits this. The “principles of comity” compel that a court should not grant national relief when doing so would “create tensions” with courts in other circuits and “would encourage forum shopping.
  • There is no constitutional right to a visa or a right of immigration or emigration. Admission into America is a privilege, not a right. Admission into America is a privilege, not a right.
  • The law is clear in the power it gives the President. The Hawaii Obama judge went much further in the opposite direction: he claimed an immigrant here has a right to bring in whatever other immigrants he wants, even citizens from terror-riddled, Sharia-law-supporting, failed, corrupted states that cannot vet or screen would-be aliens entering America.
  • The First Amendment does not apply to foreign aliens.

Barnes elaborated, attempting to make sense where there is none, saying, “Put simply, the Hawaii federal judge ruled that because the imam was Muslim and his would-be migrant visas wish-list came from Muslim-dominant nations, the First Amendment gave him a special right to bring whomever he wanted into the country, even from terror-riddled countries in security compromised states the President recognized as a direct threat to the peace of the people.”

He clarified, “The First Amendment has never applied to a right of immigration of foreign aliens, nor does it compel religious favoritism toward Muslims. This is the new left’s interpretation of the Constitution, and it is as perilous to our politics as the deep state within and radical Islam abroad.”

Barnes described the actions of Judge “Choom gang” Watson, saying, “The Hawaii Obama judge didn’t interpret the Constitution; he rewrote it, usurping to himself the sole power to control borders, then delegated the exercise of that power to a Muslim imam and his free visa wish list. The judge dishonored the rule of law in his order and disrespected our legal traditions and governing legal authorities in his reasoning for it. He effectively declared himself king and executioner.”

Barnes had more to say the following day on Breitbart radio, which can be heard below:


Thank you for reading and sharing my work –  Please look for me, Rick Wells, at , ,  and on my website http://RickWells.US  – Please SUBSCRIBE in the right sidebar at RickWells.US – not dot com.  I’m also at Stop The Takeover, and please follow me on Twitter @RickRWells.

%d bloggers like this: