The next set of UN enabling claims need to be broken down precisely, as they are quite intrusive and destructive to our nation, potentially devastating. If their Agenda is implemented, as Obama and the UN have already committed us to, America as we know it will cease to exist. Their premise is simple, the world, including the United States, is an unjust, violent, unfair and chaotic place and as such is in need of a complete societal makeover; they’re just the oligarchs for the job.
To that end they declare, “The new Agenda (2030 Sustainable Development) recognizes the need to build peaceful, just and inclusive societies that provide equal access to justice and that are based on respect for human rights (including the right to development), on effective rule of law and good governance at all levels and on transparent, effective and accountable institutions. Factors which give rise to violence, insecurity and injustice, such as inequality, corruption, poor governance and illicit financial and arms flows, are addressed in the Agenda.
The Obama regime and subversive, compromised members of Congress continue with their treasonous assault on American sovereignty. Outright treason against the United States is a serious, capital offense being perpetrated at the highest levels, more than meeting the definition under the US Constitution of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Their goal is the installation of a world government under the United Nations, one that occupies a position superior to the United States Constitution and our citizen government of the people. The mechanisms for such a global government were agreed to in September of 2015 and are set to take effect on January 1st of 2016.
To agree to such a usurpation of American sovereignty is clearly a violation of the oaths of office of every regime member and Congressman who authorizes participation and funding, as each has sworn an oath to uphold and protect the Constitution. Those flagrant violations are sufficient grounds for impeachment, were any members of the House of Representatives not compromised beyond a point of being willing to fulfill their obligation to remove a corrupt and seditious faux “president” from office. To date not one has been able or willing to author and advance the desperately needed articles of impeachment.
The weapon of choice of the anti-American forces for the installation of an illegitimate, usurping world government is a declaration under the United Nations which illegitimately proclaims its superiority and dominion over the United States; the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
The framework goes back to the 1992 Rio Earth Summit and before, all the way to the original UN incarnation as the League of Nations. Earlier articles have addressed some of the concerns of the initial portions of the Agenda 2030 document, so this one will pick up more or less where they left off, with the addressing of the climate change hoax and other equally seditious assaults on the rule of law, the Constitution and the sovereignty of the United States.
Having worked as hard as they have for as long as they have to manipulate the thinking and priorities of the ignorant masses of the world in their pursuit of the climate hoax, the last thing the globalists want is to be cut out of their payday by a competitor. To protect themselves from that potential rivalry, they’ve included a non-competition clause in the document as item 31, which asserts that, “States are strongly urged to refrain from promulgating and applying any unilateral economic, financial or trade measures not in accordance with international law and the Charter of the United Nations that impede the full achievement of economic and social development, particularly in developing countries.
The monopolistic nature of the Marxist system prohibits competition, including prohibitions under this document which are not fully enforceable under its current, non-binding construction. As it shifts to a more enforceable form, those mandates will become more onerous. Member nations are now “discouraged” from spreading or applying illegal or non-UN compliant unilateral monetary or trade measures that could impede the UN’s money-making and social engineering efforts, particularly in the prime profit areas of “developing countries. The UN doesn’t like competition.
The next items, numbers 31 through 33 were written and adopted prior to the climate COP21 climate hoax convention, a gathering of the world’s most corrupt in Paris, which took place over the first week and a half of December. The timing didn’t matter. The conclusions of the climate charade were never in doubt, they were simply rolled out. The outcome was decided long ago; all that was left was to hold the gathering to draw the appropriate attention and to create a dramatic presentation to use as an opportunity to declare an unprecedented united front.
The illusion of a consensus is vital to degrading what might otherwise be healthy skepticism into blind obedience. In doing so the proclamations by John Kerry and other slimy apostates of the “tireless, wise and inspirational” efforts of the usurper, Hussein Obama as well as the incessant proclamations of “close to 200 nations” joining in the fraud are indispensable. Sure, Hussein Obama’s efforts were critical, but they have nothing to do with saving the planet. They’re all about world government, control and getting rich.
In establishing and reinforcing their newly decreed position as the supreme authority for all things dealing with the enforcement and manipulation of populations under the guise of climate change, the climate con artists declared, “We acknowledge that the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is the primary international, intergovernmental forum for negotiating the global response to climate change. First they declare and reinforce their own dubious legitimacy, and then they use it as a tool of manipulation and the acquisition of more power.
They state in the 2030 Agenda document, “We are determined to address decisively the threat posed by climate change and environmental degradation. The global nature of climate change calls for the widest possible international cooperation aimed at accelerating the reduction of global greenhouse gas emissions and addressing adaptation to the adverse impacts of climate change.” The portion about broad international cooperation in adapting to adverse impacts provides virtually unlimited license to the climate criminals, once the agreements become binding. The degree to which they can be manipulated is directly related to the stage and percentage of totality of the power grab.
Granting themselves supreme power over all of the Earth, the UN oligarchs declared in item number 33 that social and economic development depend upon the sustainable management of our planet’s natural resources. They declared their dominion over and management responsibility “to conserve and sustainably use oceans and seas, freshwater resources, as well as forests, mountains and drylands and to protect biodiversity, ecosystems and wildlife. We are also determined to promote sustainable tourism, to tackle water scarcity and water pollution, to strengthen cooperation on desertification, dust storms, land degradation and drought and to promote resilience and disaster risk reduction. That pretty much covers every aspect of nature and every square inch of the planet. Some subterranean or atmospheric areas may have been left out temporarily; it’s something that can be quickly remedied by a UN resolution or an order of business at a subsequent climate or sustainable development gathering.
In number 34 they pledge to control city life, stating, “We recognize that sustainable urban development and management are crucial to the quality of life of our people. We will work with local authorities and communities to renew and plan our cities and human settlements so as to foster community cohesion and personal security and to stimulate innovation and employment. In an environment of high density living, in which people are relegated to living in what are little more than cages, it will be an impossible task to improve the quality of life. They know that, it’s a lie. By the time we get to the point of them being exposed the damage will be irreversible.
The oppressors declare, “We will reduce the negative impacts of urban activities,” without specifying just how those vague declarations will be accomplished. They claim the environmentally sound management and safe use of chemicals, the reduction and recycling of waste and the more efficient use of water and energy will play a role. We must remember that none of those supposed benefits will take place without associated mandates and restrictions. The more they depict their utopian view of our future the more they paint a picture of a totalitarian Hell. They also pledge to minimize the impact of cities on the global climate system. That will be done by reducing the size of domiciles, controlling our thermostats and controlling our consumption, including the type and amount of foods that we eat. It’s like a Michelle Obama school lunch program for everybody only there is no way to get a hold of some real food after you get home in the afternoon.
In item 35 they make the ominous assertion that total UN Control, Sustainable Development, cannot be realized without peace and security; and peace and security will be at risk without sustainable development. This is a dangerous justification for future infringement on the rights and liberty of free men everywhere, particularly in the West and most directly in the United States. Our Second Amendment is an obstacle to their objectives and this vague language clearly has us lined up in their crosshairs.
Peace to them means disarmament, and security is only achievable through a fully armed UN international peacekeeping force. What they advocate is the acceptance of and submission to authoritarianism.
The next set of claims needs to be broken down precisely as it is quite intrusive and destructive to our society. If their Agenda is implemented, as Obama and the UN have already committed us to, America will cease to exist. Their premise is that the world, including the United States, is an unjust, violent, unfair and chaotic place and as such is in need of a complete societal makeover. To that end they declare, “The new Agenda (2030 Sustainable Development) recognizes the need to build peaceful, just and inclusive societies that provide equal access to justice and that are based on respect for human rights (including the right to development), on effective rule of law and good governance at all levels and on transparent, effective and accountable institutions. Factors which give rise to violence, insecurity and injustice, such as inequality, corruption, poor governance and illicit financial and arms flows, are addressed in the Agenda.
They assert that “We must redouble our efforts to resolve or prevent conflict and to support post-conflict countries, including through ensuring that women have a role in peace-building and state-building.”
Peace building is typically vague and open to interpretation, state building, or nation building, which often involves aspects of nation destruction are less subject to interpretation. We know all too well the implications of these UN objectives. The blue helmets will be “peace-keeping” globally, reinforcing and enabling the tyrannical global Marxism. Their claim of a “right to development” is an open license to engage in nation building and to redistribute wealth and to mandate behavior in the process.
They exposed more of their radical militant “nation building and dismantling” side as the UN leadership stated, “We call for further effective measures and actions to be taken, in conformity with international law, to remove the obstacles to the full realization of the right of self-determination of peoples living under colonial and foreign occupation, which continue to adversely affect their economic and social development as well as their environment. They’ll be the ones to decide what is colonialism and what is foreign occupation, an unmistakable intrusion into the domestic affairs of sovereign nations.
In the further degradation and subjugation of individual nations, such as ours, to their Marxist ideology, in item 36 the oligarchs pledge to “To foster intercultural understanding, tolerance, mutual respect and an ethic of global citizenship and shared responsibility. We acknowledge the natural and cultural diversity of the world and recognize that all cultures and civilizations can contribute to, and are crucial enablers of, sustainable development.
They incorporate the means of solidification and expansion of power, what they describe in goal 17 and item 39 as the “The Means of implementation. They say, “The scale and ambition of the new Agenda requires a revitalized Global Partnership to ensure its implementation. We fully commit to this. This Partnership will work in a spirit of global solidarity, in particular solidarity with the poorest and with people in vulnerable situations. It will facilitate an intensive global engagement in support of implementation of all the Goals and targets, bringing together Governments, the private sector, civil society, the United Nations system and other actors and mobilizing all available resources.
There are two other items that should be quickly touched upon before this article concludes. One is the recurring language throughout the Sustainable Development document which states in relation to various diverse agenda items, such as number 44, “We acknowledge the importance for international financial institutions to support, in line with their mandates, the policy space of each country, in particular developing countries. We recommit to broadening and strengthening the voice and participation of developing countries – including African countries, least developed countries, landlocked developing countries, small island developing States and middle-income countries – in international economic decision-making, norm-setting and global economic governance.”
Clearly that is a call for and an acceptance of the preference for financial resources to be dispersed to an easily exploitable variety of nations, with the appropriately flexible labels of manipulation being attached to define just what kind of nation they are and a means by which to qualify for financial opportunism. African nations figure prominently, which is a benefit to the Obama agenda of electrical power generation and other pet projects he announced on his Kenya trip. The regeneration of the Export-Import Bank, and the opportune positioning of crony investors and companies to provide the associated goods and services were also intended to make the most of this opportunity. While they admit that global governance by economics is at play, there’ other games being run as well.
The UN also makes references to the role of the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations. It’s a reference that bears some consideration as to just why the UN was created in the first place, what it’s up to now, and how closely the present day scheming meshes with the original intent. But we’ll leave that for another article; this one’s gone on long enough.
I’m Rick Wells – a conservative writer who recognizes that our nation, our Constitution and our traditions are under a full scale assault from multiple threats. I’m not PC; I call it like I see it. – Please “Like” me on Facebook, “Follow” me on Twitter or visit www.rickwells.us & www.truthburgers.com.