Obama Lying, Whining His MSM Propagandists Defeated By “Fake News” Citizen Journalists

Obama understands that the ability to circumvent his propagandists in the mainstream media by average Americans utilizing the alternative media played a huge role in the defeat of Hillary Clinton. He and his anti-American world government comrades had the message all scripted, packaged, and coordinated and through the networks, entertainment, celebrities, musicians, actors, everybody that is supposed to know more than the deplorable peasant citizens, yet it still wasn’t enough, the corrupt globalist lost.

So now he’s taking the next logical step, discrediting the truth tellers, those who he and his comrades don’t control, labeling them as “fake news.” Eventually, the outlets will be identified and marginalized in some way, probably on a semi-gradual basis leading up through censorship to complete elimination. It’s been happening through Facebook and Twitter already, with conservatives being censored and their sites taken down, sometimes permanently. It’s a common headache for most of us in the alternative news field.

Back in September, before the defeat of the most corrupt individual to ever run for the office of president of the United States, a group of mainstream media and social media giants as well as Internet power players joined together for the purpose of creating a stranglehold on Internet media content. That was just before Obama gave our Internet to his global UN comrades, placing it beyond the reach of the American people and subject to more arbitrary censorship.

Obama and his globalists don’t plan to let the citizen’s voices impede their acquisition of power again or obstruct the domestication of the herd that are the American and world populations. His attack includes labeling citizen journalists as being “fake news,” and likely the creation of false flag fake content through such sites in order to demonstrate the veracity of his claims of a supposed “legitimate” need for control of the “out of control” situation.

Obama said it was not the fact that Hillary Clinton was a criminal and the American people knew it, or her support of policies that would keep Americans wallowing as third class citizens in their own nations, or that she couldn’t open her mouth without a cascade of lies pouring out that caused her to lose the election. It was what he called the “fact-free journalism spread on social media.” Yeah, he’s lying and fact free as he’s making the assertions, misconduct quite typical of the squatter in our White House.

Obama said in a press conference from Peru, rumored to have some excellent quality cocaine by those, politicians included, who partake in such recreational liberties, “If, generally, we’ve got elections that aren’t focused on issues and are full of fake news and false information and distractions, then the issue is not going to be what’s happening from the outside; the issue is going to be what are we doing for ourselves from the inside.” What the heck does that even mean Obama, is you mind even functional on “the inside?” The disinformation is from the Obama White House, call it whatever side makes you feel like a great philosopher.

Obama was still sticking with the “blame Russia for hacking, ignore the crimes that the hacks revealed” strategy that they had engaged in the effort to divert attention from leaks that exposed what he and his fellow Democrat criminals have been up to. If only those “fake news” sites on the internet hadn’t exposed them, his control of the media would have guaranteed they got away with it and pulled out a victory.

Obama is worried most of all about his inability to control the message, stating, “As I’ve said before, the concern I have has less to do with any particular misinformation or propaganda that’s being put out by any particular party, and a greater concern about the general misinformation from all kinds of sources — domestic, foreign, on social media — that make it very difficult for voters to figure out what’s true and what’s not.”

It’s much better that they just accept what his state-controlled Pravda clones tell Americans and believe his disinformation in its entirety. It’s much less confusing that way and more difficulty-free.

During an earlier stop in Germany, backing up the increasingly aggressively censorship-prone Angela Merkel in her coordinated announcement that she would seek a fourth term as German Chancellor, Obama said, “Part of ways changed in politics is social media and how people are receiving information. It’s easier to make negative attacks and simplistic slogans than it is to communicate complex policies.” This comes from the guy who’s party’s candidate that he personally campaigned for heavily, spent record amounts in bombarding the television airways with negative sound bites against Mr. Trump. Obama is nothing if he’s not consistently a hypocrite.

He expressed his dismay that the stupid Americans were unable to “discriminate between serious arguments and propaganda,” although he and his party blurred the lines through serious state-run propaganda, so that would be an natural and expected outcome.

The pathological liar and supporter of Hillary Clinton, also a pathological liar, said of the truth-telling victor, “Trump understands the new ecosystem, in which facts and truth don’t matter.”You attract attention, rouse emotions, and then move on.” More lies from the most dishonest man to ever hold the office, one who lied from the day he falsely stated his eligibility to hold the office.

 “Displaying more of his affinity for rambling irrelevance, Obama said, “In southern Illinois, in those counties I won, I was at V.F.W.s and fish fries hearing people’s stories and talking to folks, so that they knew me, referring to his Senate election in 2004, “They weren’t getting me through Fox or Rush Limbaugh or Breitbart or RedState.” Trump was holding many more public events than Hillary Clinton was, and his interaction with the voters was direct, not through television ads purchased, as was the case with Clinton, with the cash bribes of wealthy, often foreign donors. What, Mr. Obama, do your irrelevant comments about Limbaugh, Fox or Breitbart have to do with the price of tea in China?

Please like Rick on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/RickRWells/ and at Stop The Takeover, https://www.facebook.com/StopTheTakeover/ and please follow on Twitter @RickRWells I’d also appreciate it if you SUBSCRIBE in the right sidebar on my website at http://RickWells.us.